Appeals Court Tosses Out Climate Case Brought By 21 Young Plaintiffs

In a lawsuit filed by 21 young individuals, the government is accused of neglecting climate change, infringing on constitutional rights. Initially filed in 2015, the case was deemed compelling by a 9th Circuit Court panel but was ruled to be addressed by political branches or voters. A dissenting judge likened the situation to an asteroid threat, criticizing the government's stance. The supporting legal organization plans to seek a full court review.

What was the ruling of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the case?

What analogy did the dissenting judge use to describe the urgency of the situation?