TED: Does the media have a "duty of care"? - David Puttnam

The video discusses the Paisley snail case, highlighting its significance in establishing a duty of care in law. It critiques the media's role in political engagement, emphasizing the need for responsible journalism to support democracy. The speaker argues for extending the duty of care to protect democratic values and stresses the importance of balancing freedom of expression with social responsibilities. The video concludes by addressing the challenges facing democracy and the media's role in shaping political discourse.

What event led to the case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson?

What was the significant legal precedent set by the case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson?

How did the Hansard Society describe the impact of tabloid newspapers on political citizenship?

What does the speaker suggest about the relationship between media consumption and political engagement?

What is meant by the term 'duty of care' as discussed in the text?

What was the motto displayed in the new school opened by the speaker?

How does the speaker relate the concept of duty of care to democracy?

What are the consequences of the media failing to uphold their responsibilities according to the speaker?

In what ways does the speaker suggest that the media can influence public perception of politics?

What does the speaker believe is necessary for a vibrant democracy?