Comey Testimony Fuels Both Sides of Trump Argument

The transcript discusses the early release of former FBI Director James Comey's testimony, highlighting its unusual tone and style. It covers political reactions, with Trump's allies seeing no obstruction of justice, while Democrats find criticism. The legal nuances of obstruction of justice are explored, noting the high bar for such accusations. Specifics of the testimony reveal that Comey was not directly asked to halt the Flynn investigation, with some dismissing the President's comments as 'New York talk.' The testimony's narrative style is likened to a John Grisham novel.

What were the reactions of both Democrats and Republicans to Comey's testimony?

What is the significance of the term 'obstruction of justice' in the context of the testimony?