Supreme Court Won't Intervene In Climate Scientist Defamation Suit

The transcript discusses a defamation lawsuit filed by climate scientist Michael Mann against the National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. The lawsuit stems from allegations of data manipulation and misconduct. The National Review article compared Mann's investigation to a separate case involving Jerry Sandusky. The Supreme Court declined to intervene, allowing the case to proceed in lower courts. Mann expressed satisfaction with the decision, while National Review and Justice Samuel Alito voiced concerns about First Amendment implications.

What did Samuel Alito express in his dissent regarding the case?

What is National Review's stance on the lawsuit following the Supreme Court's decision?