Why do Federal Judges Have Lifetime Appointments? Government Review

The video discusses why federal judges, including Supreme Court judges, have lifetime terms. It explores the role of judges in interpreting the Constitution and the power of judicial review. Historical examples, such as Brown vs. Board, are used to illustrate the importance of judicial independence from public opinion. The democratic process of appointing judges is also examined, questioning whether judges should face voters or continue with lifetime terms.

Discuss the potential consequences of having judges who are elected versus those who serve for life.

In what ways might public opinion influence judicial decisions if judges were required to face voters?