Johnson stalwart quits No 10 in outrage over use of Savile slur against Starmer

The speaker aims to clarify a previous statement, emphasizing that the discussion is not about the personal record of the leader of the opposition when he was DPP, but rather about his responsibility for the organization as a whole. The speaker stresses the importance of understanding this distinction to avoid misunderstandings.

What emotions does the speaker express regarding the topic discussed?

What is the main point the speaker is trying to clarify regarding the leader of the opposition?

How does the speaker feel about the public's perception of the leader's past decisions?

What does the speaker emphasize about the leader's responsibility?

Why does the speaker want to clarify their statements?