TED-Ed: Ethical dilemma: What makes life worth living? | Douglas MacLean

The video discusses a species reliant on Neuronium for cognition and energy. Neuronium is now compromised, threatening extinction. A comet offers Polyxate, an alternative energy source, but it affects cognition. The council must choose between Neuronium, preserving culture but risking extinction, or Polyxate, ensuring survival but losing cultural identity. Doctor Tayloff argues for Neuronium, valuing culture and meaningfulness, while Doctor Kahan supports Polyxate, prioritizing life preservation and happiness. The decision hinges on ethical considerations of existence and quality of life.

How does Doctor Kahan justify the switch to Polyxate despite its drawbacks?

What is the moral dilemma faced by the council regarding the choice between Pneuronium and Polyxate?

In your opinion, what should the council prioritize: the preservation of culture or the continuation of life?