Stewart Brand + Mark Z. Jacobson: Debate: Does the world need nuclear energy?

The debate centers on whether nuclear energy is what the world needs now. Stewart Brand argues in favor, highlighting nuclear's low greenhouse gas emissions and potential for disarmament. Mark Jacobson counters, emphasizing the risks of nuclear proliferation and the viability of renewables. Audience members contribute their views, and a final vote shows a shift in opinion, though both sides gain supporters.

What is the significance of the term 'Renewistan' as mentioned in the debate?

What alternative energy sources were discussed as being viable compared to nuclear energy?

How does the construction time of nuclear power plants compare to renewable energy sources?

What was the final vote outcome regarding the proposition after the debate?