Rational Basis Review - Minimum Rationality

The video tutorial explains the rational basis or minimum rationality standard of constitutional review. It highlights that the government must justify any law it passes, especially if it affects individual rights. If a law does not impact a fundamental right, a lower standard of review, known as the rational basis standard, is applied. This standard checks if there is a legitimate reason and rational connection between the law and the government's goals. If a law is arbitrary with no legitimate reasoning, it is likely unconstitutional.

What is the rational basis or minimum rationality standard of constitutional review?

What must the government justify when passing a law?

What happens if a law affects a constitutionally protected right?

What is required for a law to be considered constitutional under the rational basis standard?

What would make a law likely unconstitutional according to the text?