CLEAN : Femen protesters in French court after Not

The video discusses a trial against famine, which is perceived as a baseless accusation without proof. The speaker expresses confidence in their actions, asserting they were legal and caused no damage. The latter part of the transcript contains unrelated and unclear content.

What is the speaker's opinion about the trial they are facing?

What does the speaker mean by referring to the trial as 'punishment for blasphemy'?

Why does the speaker question Notre Dame's decision to take them to trial?

How does the speaker feel about their actions in relation to the trial?

What does the speaker imply about the evidence against them?