Silence is Not Acceptance of an Offer

The video tutorial discusses the concept of contract acceptance, emphasizing that acceptance must align with the offeror's terms. Silence is generally not considered acceptance, except in specific business contexts where merchants may implicitly accept goods by retaining them without objection. This exception is limited to business transactions, and individuals cannot be bound by silence.

What is required for a contract to be accepted according to the text?

Explain why silence by the offeree does not constitute acceptance of a contract.

What is the exception to the general rule that silence is not acceptance?

How does the acceptance of goods between merchants differ from individual acceptance?

In what situation can silence be considered acceptance of an agreement?