Anjem Choudary Found Convicted of Supporting ISIS

Anjem Choudary, a British Pakistani, was convicted of supporting the Islamic State through speeches that inspired many to join the group. Despite claiming free speech rights, his actions were deemed to cross into criminality. His trial revealed his influence on associates like Siddhartha Dhar, who fled to Syria. Choudary's background as a solicitor and his radicalization journey were highlighted, showing his manipulative tactics to radicalize others. The jury found him guilty, marking a significant legal challenge in addressing extremist rhetoric.

In what ways did Choudary's background contribute to his radicalization?

What was the public's reaction to Choudary's statements after terrorist attacks?

What are the challenges in prosecuting individuals like Choudary for their rhetoric?