VOICED: Film sparks firestorm over flawed Mexican legal system

The video discusses Antonio's wrongful conviction for murder in Mexico, highlighting the role of two law students who uncovered inconsistencies in his case, leading to a retrial. Despite evidence of his innocence, Antonio's sentence was reinstated, only to be overturned on appeal. The film documenting his story aims to expose systemic injustices in Mexico's judicial system and spark debate on legal reforms. The film's release has been controversial, with privacy concerns raised by a key witness.

What changes occurred in Antonio's life after the retrial?

What inconsistencies were found in the evidence against Antonio?

How did the film makers hope to impact the perception of the justice system in Mexico?

What legal reform was introduced in 2008 to improve the justice system?

What was the reaction of a main witness regarding the film's release?