Sir Dave Brailsford defends Team Sky's 100 percent clean record

Team Sky, known for its success in the Tour de France, faces scrutiny over Bradley Wiggins' use of a banned drug under a medical exemption. The team's principal defends the decision, citing medical necessity and trust in the process. Criticism arises over lack of transparency, prompting policy changes for future openness. Ethical questions persist, but Brailsford maintains a zero-tolerance stance on doping. The situation highlights the balance between medical confidentiality and public interest, ultimately testing trust in the team and its riders.

What is the central ethical stance that Brailsford has taken regarding doping?

What does the situation ultimately come down to, according to the text?