Candidato del PRI mexicano promete combatir corrupción

The transcript discusses the concept of presidential immunity and the importance of having an independent Attorney General to investigate potential misdeeds by the President or administration officials. The speaker emphasizes the rule of law, stating that the President should not be above the Attorney General in terms of investigative capacity. The speaker also highlights global practices in countries like Singapore, Hong Kong, Italy, and the US, where those combating corruption have full autonomy. The discussion concludes with a clarification that immunity should not be decided by the President, reinforcing the need for an autonomous Attorney General's office.

According to the speaker, what should be the basis for determining immunity for the President?

What does the speaker imply about the role of the President in deciding legal matters?