U.K. Supreme Court: Johnson's Parliament Suspension Unlawful

The transcript discusses the prorogation of the UK Parliament, highlighting its impact on parliamentary functions and democracy. It explains the differences between prorogation and recess, emphasizing the exceptional circumstances surrounding the prorogation. The court found the prorogation unlawful, as it hindered Parliament's constitutional role without justification. The judgment declared the prorogation void, allowing Parliament to resume its duties. The court's decision underscores the importance of parliamentary sovereignty and the need for government actions to be legally justified.

How did the court describe the effect of the prorogation on Parliament's constitutional functions?

What was the court's conclusion regarding the legality of the Prime Minister's advice to prorogue Parliament?

What steps can Parliament take following the court's ruling on prorogation?