AT&T Lawyer Says Merger Decision 'Sound and Proper'

The court has rejected the government's attempt to block a historic merger, highlighting the merger's benefits for consumers. Despite an 18-month process, the decision was based on facts and evidence, with the government unable to substantiate its theories. The merger's significance is unique to its context, and the court's decision underscores the lack of credible proof from the government.

What does the speaker express about the future after the court's decision?

What was the outcome of the government's theories presented in court?