Street art depicting Boris strung up removed

The speaker discusses a controversial image depicting Boris Johnson, which was displayed in Northfield Town Center. The image sparked online debate about the appropriateness of depicting violence against politicians. The speaker clarifies that they do not condone violence but used the image to provoke thought and discussion about political accountability. They highlight the disparity in reactions to images versus real-world violence and express surprise at the image's longevity in a conservative area. The speaker reflects on the nature of public discourse, especially on platforms like Twitter, and emphasizes the need for collective action against systemic issues.

What was the image that the speaker posted online, and what was its significance?

How does the speaker justify their choice of controversial imagery in relation to political accountability?

What reactions did the speaker receive from the public regarding the image they posted?

In what way does the speaker express their views on the nature of opinions shared on social media?

What was the speaker's intention behind choosing Northfield as the location for their controversial post?