Confusion over the referenda will lead to ‘solicitors’ paradise’

The video discusses the potential for another referendum due to confusion surrounding the current one. It highlights issues with archaic language in the constitution, particularly regarding women's roles. The 'mother in the home' amendment is analyzed, revealing contradictions between government actions and societal realities. The economic pressures on families, such as high rents and mortgages, are emphasized, showing a lack of governmental support for family choices.

What changes does the speaker wish to see in the language and principles regarding family rights?

In what ways does the speaker suggest that mothers are affected by economic pressures?