CLEAN : Suu Kyi's lawyer: trial adjourned once again due to internet disruption

The transcript discusses the challenges of conducting video conferencing for legal hearings, particularly focusing on a case adjourned to April 1st. It highlights the political context where leaders face charges and questions the fairness of trials. The discussion includes legal principles regarding evidence admissibility, emphasizing that confessions under arrest cannot be used in court. The transcript concludes with an application to the court to avoid video conferencing for trials.

What concerns are raised regarding the fairness of trials for leaders of the winning party?

What is the significance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the context of trials?

How does the Evidence Act relate to the rights of defendants during trials?

What are the implications of a confession made under arrest in relation to evidence admissibility?

Why is video conferencing considered inadmissible for conducting trials according to the statements made?