Chief cabinet secretary on death of aid worker in Afghanistan

The transcript discusses the strong outrage felt towards inhumane acts and the commitment to respond to Ito's intentions by striving for peace as a cooperative nation. It emphasizes the importance of Japan's continued involvement in the global strategy against terrorism, warning that withdrawing would contradict international movements.

What feelings does the speaker express towards the inhumane acts mentioned?

What commitment does the speaker mention in response to Mr. Ito's wishes?

What does the speaker believe Japan must do in the future regarding peace cooperation?

What would it mean for Japan to fall out of the strategy against terrorism?

How does the speaker relate Japan's actions to the movements of the international community?