First lady defends sons accused of illegal business dealings

The transcript discusses the limits of a forum and the speaker's intention to defend their family's name using constitutional rights. It highlights the awareness of Martha Sagum regarding the use of her and her husband's names in influence trafficking. The discussion further explains the roles of the influenced and the influencer, identifying the children as influencers due to their relationship with Martha Sagum.

What does Mr. González-Ishmal imply about the forum's limit?

What does the speaker intend to do after the forum ends?

How does the speaker describe their rights according to the Constitution?

What knowledge did Martha Sagum have regarding the use of her name?

Who are the two actors involved in the traffic of influences mentioned?