French court overturns Concorde crash conviction

The video covers a court session where the 8th chamber of the court of appeal discusses a case involving an accident. The court concludes that the company was not responsible, attributing the cause to a lamella and the actions of Continental's employees. Despite identifying faults, the court deemed them insufficient for further action, leading to a general acquittal. This decision leaves victims with a sense of unease, as the court acknowledges systemic issues in aviation safety without drawing significant conclusions.

What was the implication of the court's decision on the responsibility of the airline?

What sentiment did the speaker express regarding the court's handling of the case?