Memorial to mark 1st anniversary of Nord Orst theatre siege

The transcript discusses the resilience against terrorism, emphasizing that it cannot achieve its goals in Moscow or Russia. It highlights the importance of justice, focusing on the desire for the victims to be alive rather than on the actions taken post-tragedy. The speaker critiques the emergency response, suggesting that immediate on-site actions could have saved more lives, rather than transporting victims across Moscow.

What does the speaker believe about the impact of terrorism on their resolve?

How does the speaker define justice in the context of loss?

In the speaker's view, what is more important than the steps taken after the tragedy?

What is the speaker's opinion on the importance of identifying those responsible for the tragedy?

What does the speaker suggest should have been done to save more lives?