CLEAN : Doping Russia Sport Minister could not have been unaware

The transcript discusses the prevalence of an issue, suggesting it was impossible for someone to be unaware of it. Despite this, the person was unaware, leading to a conclusion of complicity. The inference is drawn from the evidence examined.

In what way does the text indicate the individual's lack of ignorance regarding the situation?

What does the phrase 'we actually had a chance to examine' imply about the investigation?