Apple: U.S. Can’t Force It to Unlock Terrorist’s iPhone

The transcript discusses Apple's legal response to a court case compelling it to unlock an iPhone related to the San Bernardino incident. Apple argues that complying would violate its rights and set a dangerous precedent, potentially compromising the security of millions of devices. The case has significant business implications, especially in light of past revelations about US government spying, which have affected trust in US tech companies abroad. Apple seeks to have the debate in Congress rather than court, emphasizing the broader privacy and business concerns.

In what ways have foreign customers reacted to U.S. companies regarding data privacy?

What implications does the case have for the future of enterprise technologies in the U.S.?