Ex-KGB agent slams Litvinenko inquiry

The speaker denies any involvement with certain materials, labeling any presented documents as falsified and insincere. They criticize US and UK intelligence agencies for illegal activities and suggest that any documents from these agencies are deceitful. The speaker concludes by implying possible complicity in an incident involving an officer in London and expresses gratitude.

What does the speaker imply about the authenticity of the materials mentioned?

How does the speaker characterize the actions of the American and British intelligence services?

What is the speaker's opinion on documents coming from British intelligence?

What does the speaker suggest about the purpose of the documents presented by British intelligence?

What incident involving an agent-officer does the speaker refer to?