Title IX Advocates Critical Of DeVos

The transcript discusses concerns about DeVos's approach to investigations, suggesting her goal is not equality but rather to disadvantage survivors. It emphasizes the importance of Article 9 for educational access and equity, warning against returning to times when sexual violence was ignored. The speaker criticizes DeVos for disregarding evidence from survivors and stresses the need for a separate Title IX process to protect educational access.

What is suggested about DeVos's goal regarding investigations?

• To ensure equality for all parties involved

• To maintain the status quo

• To favor survivors in investigations

• To skew investigations against survivors

What could happen if the administration turns its back on Article 9?

• Schools might ignore sexual violence

• Schools would become more transparent

• Educational access for men might be limited

• More resources would be allocated to education

Why is Article 9 considered essential?

• It provides financial aid to students

• It ensures educational access and equity

• It promotes sports activities

• It offers scholarships to survivors

What does the speaker criticize about the actions taken?

• They are overly strict

• They are well-researched

• They are too lenient

• They are mean-spirited and ignore evidence

What is emphasized as necessary apart from the criminal justice system?

• A separate Title IX process

• More funding for education

• A unified legal system

• Increased security measures