Senator Schumer counters Kavanaugh defenders amid allegation

The transcript discusses the defense of Judge Kavanaugh, focusing on arguments that his past actions should not impact his current career. The speaker criticizes these defenses, emphasizing the importance of accountability and credibility, especially for a Supreme Court nominee. The discussion highlights the significance of evaluating a nominee's credibility, regardless of the time elapsed since the alleged incidents.

What is one of the excuses mentioned by Kavanaugh's defenders regarding the events from 36 years ago?

• It was a different era.

• Boys will be boys.

• He was not involved.

• It was a misunderstanding.

What is the speaker's stance on the argument that past actions should not affect Kavanaugh's career?

• They have no opinion on it.

• They disagree with it.

• They partially agree with it.

• They agree with it.

Why does the speaker believe credibility is crucial for a Supreme Court nominee?

• Because it is a requirement by law.

• Because it ensures fair trials.

• Because it affects public opinion.

• Because it reflects on the nominee's character.

What is the speaker's view on the relevance of events from 36 years ago?

• They believe it is irrelevant.

• They believe it is only relevant in certain cases.

• They believe it is somewhat relevant.

• They believe it is very relevant.

What does the speaker suggest should be examined regarding Kavanaugh's treatment?

• His legal qualifications.

• His personal life.

• His political affiliations.

• His credibility.