VOICED : Fallo a favor de Greenpeace

The video discusses the absence of Russian representation at a tribunal where a ruling favored Greenpeace activists detained in Russia. Despite the tribunal's decision, Russia rejected the ruling, claiming it was outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. Greenpeace viewed the decision as a victory, asserting their activists acted peacefully and legally. Most activists were released on bail, but they still face legal proceedings and potential prison sentences.

What was the reaction of Moscow to the tribunal's decision regarding the Greenpeace activists?

• They partially accepted the decision.

• They accepted the decision.

• They rejected the decision.

• They ignored the decision.

How does Greenpeace view the tribunal's decision?

• As a partial victory.

• As a victory.

• As a defeat.

• As irrelevant.

What is Greenpeace's stance on the actions of their activists?

• They acted without any plan.

• They acted illegally.

• They acted peacefully and legally.

• They acted violently.

What happened to most of the Greenpeace activists detained in the Arctic?

• They were acquitted.

• They were sentenced to prison.

• They were deported.

• They were released on bail.

What is the potential outcome for the Greenpeace activists still facing legal proceedings?

• They could be pardoned.

• They could be given community service.

• They could be sentenced to several years in prison.

• They could be fined.