CLEAN : Taiwan demands apology from WHO chief over virus 'slander'

CLEAN : Taiwan demands apology from WHO chief over virus 'slander'

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Other

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Wayground Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses Taiwan's capability and willingness to participate in global health initiatives alongside other countries. It highlights Taiwan's diplomatic efforts and responses to accusations made by the WHO Director-General, emphasizing that Taiwan has not engaged in personal attacks or racial discrimination. The transcript concludes with a call for the WHO Director-General to correct false accusations and apologize to Taiwan.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Taiwan's position regarding participation in global health initiatives?

Taiwan is unwilling to participate.

Taiwan has no interest in global health cooperation.

Taiwan is capable and willing to participate.

Taiwan is only willing to participate if invited by WHO.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Taiwan respond to its exclusion from WHO activities?

By withdrawing from all international cooperation.

By ignoring the exclusion.

By expressing strong dissatisfaction and regret.

By encouraging personal attacks on WHO officials.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Taiwan emphasize about its national character in response to WHO exclusion?

Taiwan is a developing nation.

Taiwan is a closed society.

Taiwan is a mature and high-quality democracy.

Taiwan is indifferent to international opinions.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What action does Taiwan demand from the WHO Director-General regarding the accusations?

To continue with the accusations.

To provide evidence for the accusations.

To ignore the accusations.

To correct the accusations and apologize.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the nature of the accusations made by the WHO Director-General against Taiwan?

They are well-founded and accurate.

They are neutral and factual.

They are unfounded and irresponsible.

They are supportive and positive.