Neuroscientist and philosopher Sam Harris on the Templeton Prize

In this interview, Sam Harris discusses the Templeton Foundation's influence on science, critiquing its blending of science and religion. He explores the implications of religious moderation versus fundamentalism and advocates for rational discourse in ethics and spirituality. Harris emphasizes the conflict between science and religion, highlighting the need for intellectual honesty. The conversation concludes with reflections on the challenges of changing religious beliefs.

What is the primary concern Sam Harris has with the Templeton Foundation?

• It funds only religious projects.

• It blurs the line between science and religion.

• It supports only atheist scientists.

• It promotes scientific research.

According to Sam Harris, what is the original mandate of the Templeton Foundation?

• To exonerate Christian superstition in light of science.

• To fund religious institutions.

• To promote scientific literacy.

• To support secular education.

How does Sam Harris view religious moderation compared to fundamentalism?

• As equally problematic.

• As irrelevant to the science-religion debate.

• As a step towards rationality.

• As worse than fundamentalism.

What does Sam Harris believe religious moderation prevents?

• Promoting religious fundamentalism.

• Understanding scientific principles.

• Encouraging atheism.

• Criticizing religious dogmatism.

What is Sam Harris's stance on the role of argument in changing religious beliefs?

• He believes it is ineffective.

• He considers it a waste of time.

• He believes it only strengthens beliefs.

• He thinks it can play a significant role.

What does Sam Harris suggest is necessary for a rational discussion about ethics and spirituality?

• Embracing all religious ideologies.

• Jettisoning outdated beliefs.

• Ignoring scientific evidence.

• Adhering to religious texts.

Why does Sam Harris criticize the Templeton Foundation's support of well-subscribed dogmatism?

• It is too controversial.

• It is seen as benign and not worth opposing.

• It is not well-funded.

• It is too focused on science.

What analogy does Sam Harris use to illustrate the conflict between science and religion?

• The conflict between science and art.

• The conflict between science and witchcraft.

• The conflict between science and politics.

• The conflict between science and technology.

What does Sam Harris believe is the antithesis of the scientific attitude?

• Empirical research.

• Faith without evidence.

• Rational thinking.

• Logical reasoning.

What does Sam Harris suggest is necessary for understanding human experiences in the 21st century?

• Adhering to religious doctrines.

• Ignoring scientific advancements.

• Relying on ancient philosophies.

• Using 21st-century rational discourse.