Reasoning Through Time: Deductive vs Inductive Approaches in Philosophy and Science

Reasoning Through Time: Deductive vs Inductive Approaches in Philosophy and Science

Assessment

Interactive Video

Philosophy, Science, History

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video tutorial explains the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning, dating back to Aristotle, involves starting with general premises leading to a specific, certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning, popularized by Francis Bacon, involves making repeated observations to form a probable conclusion. The video compares the two, highlighting deductive reasoning as top-down and inductive as bottom-up. It also discusses the limitations of inductive reasoning, emphasizing that it cannot lead to certain knowledge. The tutorial concludes by encouraging viewers to subscribe for more content.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary characteristic of deductive reasoning?

It starts with specific observations.

It is based on repeated experiments.

It leads to a probable conclusion.

It begins with a general premise.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who is associated with the development of inductive reasoning?

Aristotle

David Hume

Rene Descartes

Sir Francis Bacon

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does inductive reasoning differ from deductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning is top-down.

Deductive reasoning leads to probable conclusions.

Inductive reasoning starts with specific instances.

Deductive reasoning is bottom-up.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is an example of a deductive reasoning statement?

Triangles have three sides.

Socrates is mortal because all men are mortal.

The sun rises in the east.

All observed swans are white.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Descartes' statement 'I think, therefore I am' exemplify?

Inductive reasoning

Philosophical skepticism

Empirical observation

Deductive reasoning

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the example with Blake, what would need to be checked if the conclusion is false?

The observations

The premises

The hypothesis

The generalization

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key limitation of inductive reasoning?

It always leads to false conclusions.

It is based on ancient authorities.

It cannot lead to certain knowledge.

It does not involve observations.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?