Colonial Self-Governance and Early Political Systems in America

The video discusses the evolution of self-governance in early American colonies, starting with the establishment of local assemblies like the House of Burgesses and the Mayflower Compact. It highlights the influence of English political systems and the balance of power among monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. The colonies developed their own assemblies, gaining powers such as taxation, which led to tensions with England. The Glorious Revolution and subsequent colonial revolutions emphasized the colonists' desire for rights and self-governance. The video also contrasts the democratic nature of the colonies with England and explores the intertwined growth of slavery and freedom.

What was the significance of the Mayflower Compact in early colonial governance?

• It was a trade agreement with England.

• It allowed for annual elections of governors and assistants.

• It was the first written constitution in America.

• It established a monarchy in the colonies.

How did the colonial assemblies gain power over the governors?

• By controlling the military forces.

• By having the ability to tax.

• By appointing the governors themselves.

• By forming alliances with other colonies.

What was the Dominion of New England?

• A military alliance against Native American tribes.

• A union of southern colonies for trade purposes.

• A consolidation of northern colonies under a single governor.

• An agreement between colonies to abolish slavery.

What was a key difference between English and American politics in the colonial period?

• English politics had no influence on the colonies.

• American colonies were more democratic.

• English politics allowed women to vote.

• American politics had no voting rights.

How did the concept of slavery influence the understanding of freedom in colonial America?

• It led to the abolition of all forms of governance.

• It was unrelated to the concept of freedom.

• It provided a contrasting perspective on liberty.

• It was seen as a necessary evil for economic growth.