The Power of Judicial Review in American Government

The Power of Judicial Review in American Government

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History, Political Science

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video discusses the concept of judicial review, its powers, and its origins in the Marbury vs. Madison case. It explains how judicial review allows the Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional and its impact on federal and state actions. The video also covers the longevity of judicial review and its implications on the separation of powers, using examples like Miranda vs. Arizona. The conclusion highlights the evolution of U.S. governance and the implied powers of different branches.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary function of judicial review in the context of the Supreme Court?

To enforce laws

To create new laws

To declare laws unconstitutional

To review lower court decisions

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which clause in the Constitution allows the Supreme Court to overturn state actions?

Equal Protection Clause

Necessary and Proper Clause

Supremacy Clause

Commerce Clause

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following is NOT an area where the Supreme Court exercises judicial review?

Presidential actions

State actions

International treaties

Congressional laws

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In which case did the Supreme Court establish its power of judicial review?

Miranda vs. Arizona

Marbury vs. Madison

Roe vs. Wade

Brown vs. Board of Education

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the strategic outcome of Chief Justice John Marshall's decision in Marbury vs. Madison?

It strengthened the Court's future power by establishing judicial review.

It weakened the Supreme Court permanently.

It resulted in Marbury receiving his commission.

It led to the impeachment of President Jefferson.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What principle ensures that Supreme Court precedents are generally followed by future courts?

Judicial Activism

Originalism

Stare Decisis

Judicial Restraint

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the Supreme Court's decision in Miranda vs. Arizona impact law enforcement procedures?

It mandated that police inform arrested individuals of their rights.

It prohibited police from using confessions in court.

It allowed police to detain suspects indefinitely.

It required police to obtain a warrant before arresting someone.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?