Search Header Logo
Plessy v. Ferguson Case Study

Plessy v. Ferguson Case Study

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Moral Science

9th - 10th Grade

Practice Problem

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video discusses the landmark case Plessy v. Ferguson, where Homer Plessy's act of civil disobedience challenged Louisiana's segregation laws. The Citizens Committee organized this as a test case against the Separate Car Act. Despite arguments that the law violated the 13th and 14th Amendments, the Supreme Court upheld the 'separate but equal' doctrine, leading to widespread segregation under Jim Crow laws. Justice Harlan's dissent highlighted the decision's negative implications, which persisted until Brown v. Board of Education overturned it in 1954.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main reason Homer Plessy was considered a hero despite breaking the law?

He was a famous lawyer.

He was a test case for civil rights.

He was a wealthy businessman.

He was a government official.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who organized the protest that led to Plessy's arrest?

The East Louisiana Railroad

The Supreme Court

The Citizens Committee

The Louisiana State Legislature

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why was Homer Plessy chosen for the protest?

He volunteered for the protest.

He was a well-known activist.

He had a mixed racial background.

He was a member of the Citizens Committee.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of Plessy's initial court case?

He won the case.

Judge Ferguson ruled against him.

The case was dismissed.

He was acquitted.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main argument of Plessy's lawyers in the Supreme Court?

Plessy was not actually black.

The law violated the 13th and 14th Amendments.

Plessy had a right to a fair trial.

The law was too expensive to enforce.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the Supreme Court justify the 'separate but equal' doctrine?

By saying it was a federal requirement.

By arguing it was a temporary measure.

By claiming it did not imply inferiority.

By stating it ensured social equality.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Justice John Harlan's view on the Supreme Court's decision?

He thought it was irrelevant.

He predicted negative consequences.

He believed it would lead to racial harmony.

He fully supported it.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?

Similar Resources on Wayground