Judiciary and Constitutional Principles

Judiciary and Constitutional Principles

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Political Science

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video discusses Federalist 78, focusing on Alexander Hamilton's arguments for life terms for federal judges to ensure an independent judiciary. It explains why the judiciary is considered the least dangerous branch, lacking enforcement power, and highlights the importance of judicial review in protecting the Constitution. The video concludes by inviting viewers to share their thoughts on the topic.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What are the three main ideas discussed in Federalist 78?

Bicameral legislature, presidential veto, and state sovereignty

Separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism

Judicial activism, legislative supremacy, and executive privilege

Life terms for judges, independent judiciary, and judicial review

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why does Hamilton argue that life tenure for judges is not a threat to democracy?

Judges can be easily removed by Congress

Judges are subject to frequent performance reviews

Judges have limited power compared to other branches

Judges are elected by the people

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Hamilton mean by saying the judiciary is the 'least dangerous' branch?

It controls the military and budget

It cannot enforce its own rulings

It is directly elected by the people

It has the most power over the other branches

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Hamilton describe the judiciary's power compared to the legislative and executive branches?

As having equal power with the other branches

As being the weakest branch

As being the most influential branch

As having the power of the purse and sword

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is an independent judiciary important according to Hamilton?

To prevent the judiciary from being dominated by other branches

To allow judges to make decisions based on public opinion

To ensure judges can be influenced by Congress

To enable judges to create new laws

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What would happen if judges were influenced by Congress or the President?

They would make impartial decisions

They might rule in favor of Congress or the President

They would have more independence

They would be more accountable to the public

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the role of judicial review in protecting the Constitution?

To ensure judges follow public opinion

To give the president power to appoint judges

To enable the judiciary to strike down unconstitutional laws

To allow Congress to override judicial decisions

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?