Lopez vs. United States Case Analysis

Lopez vs. United States Case Analysis

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies, Law

11th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video discusses the legal implications of recorded conversations, focusing on the 1963 case of Lopez vs. United States. German Lopez, who operated an inn, was investigated by IRS agent Roger Davis for tax evasion. Lopez attempted to bribe Davis, who later recorded their conversation with government approval. The recording was used as evidence in court, leading to Lopez's conviction. The case highlights issues of privacy and admissibility of recorded evidence in legal proceedings.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What legal concerns are associated with recording conversations?

Environmental regulations

Intellectual property rights

Tax evasion

Privacy and Fourth Amendment issues

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the Lopez vs. United States case, what was the main legal question?

The legality of tax evasion

The admissibility of a recorded conversation

The validity of a search warrant

The rights of a government agent

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was German Lopez accused of in his initial interaction with Roger Davis?

Operating without a license

Bribing a government agent

Tax evasion

Illegal gambling

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Lopez offer Davis during their meeting in Lopez's office?

$500

$420

$300

$600

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Davis do after receiving money from Lopez?

Donated it to charity

Used it to pay taxes

Reported it to a regional inspector

Kept it for himself

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What device did Davis use to record his conversation with Lopez?

A video camera

A pocket recorder and transmitter

A smartphone

A laptop

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Lopez admit during the recorded conversation?

He claimed innocence

He denied all charges

He confessed to a different crime

He admitted to tax liability and bribery

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?