Schechter Poultry Corp. Case Analysis

In 1935, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States case, focusing on Congress's authority to regulate interstate activities. Schechter, a New York poultry company, was convicted of violating labor and trade regulations. The Supreme Court found these regulations unconstitutional as they did not directly affect interstate commerce. The decision limited Congress's regulatory power under the Commerce Clause, emphasizing the need to avoid excessive regulation of local businesses.

What was the central issue in the Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States case?

• The impact of music on legal proceedings

• The role of the Supreme Court

• Congress's authority over interstate activities

• The legality of poultry farming

Why was Schechter Poultry Corp. convicted?

• For not paying taxes

• For violating labor and trade regulations

• For selling poultry without a license

• For importing poultry illegally

What did the defendants argue regarding the regulations?

• They were outdated

• They were not applicable to poultry

• They were unconstitutional

• They were too lenient

What was the Circuit Court of Appeals' decision?

• It upheld most convictions except for two counts

• It overturned all convictions

• It dismissed the case

• It ruled in favor of the government

What was the role of intermediaries in the live poultry industry?

• They were responsible for breeding poultry

• They acted as middlemen between buyers and sellers

• They provided transportation for poultry

• They regulated poultry prices

What did the Supreme Court conclude about the transactions in question?

• They were illegal

• They did not directly affect interstate commerce

• They directly affected interstate commerce

• They were beneficial to the economy

What was the government's argument regarding labor hours and wages?

• They had a direct impact on prices

• They were irrelevant to the case

• They had no impact on prices

• They should be increased

What warning did the Supreme Court give about granting Congress control over certain aspects?

• It could result in excessive regulation of small businesses

• It could simplify legal processes

• It could lead to economic growth

• It could improve labor conditions

What was the Supreme Court's final ruling regarding Congress's authority?

• Congress should have more authority

• The case should be retried

• There was no constitutional justification for expanding Congress's authority

• Congress had full authority over interstate activities

What was the outcome for the government's attempts to expand its authority?

• They were rejected by the Supreme Court

• They were ignored

• They were partially accepted

• They were successful