Japanese American Internment Cases

Japanese American Internment Cases

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Moral Science

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses three pivotal Supreme Court cases related to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Gordon Hirabayashi challenged the evacuation and curfew orders, highlighting racial bias and civil rights violations. Fred Korematsu defied evacuation orders, questioning why only Japanese Americans were targeted. Mitsu Endo successfully challenged her internment, leading to the rescinding of exclusion orders and the closure of internment camps.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the significance of the Ex parte Endo case?

It was the first case to challenge the internment camps.

It was the last of three key cases related to the internment camps.

It upheld the evacuation orders.

It was about the curfew imposed on Japanese Americans.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Gordon Hirabayashi challenge in his case?

The closure of the camps

The internment itself

The exclusion orders

The evacuation order and racial bias of the curfew

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main reason given for the army's decision to limit the movements of Japanese Americans?

Economic necessity

Wartime necessity

Political pressure

Social unrest

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did Fred Korematsu defy the evacuation order?

To stay with his family

To challenge the curfew

To stay with his Caucasian girlfriend

To protest against the internment

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of Fred Korematsu's case?

The racial bias was acknowledged.

The evacuation order was overturned.

The internment was declared unconstitutional.

The army's decision to evacuate was upheld.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Mitsuye Endo file a petition for?

A change in the evacuation order

Habeas corpus

A new trial

Compensation for internment

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the Supreme Court's decision in Mitsuye Endo's case?

The internment camps were necessary.

The exclusion orders were justified.

The government cannot detain loyal citizens against their will.

The government can detain loyal citizens.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?