First Amendment Rights and Landmark Cases

First Amendment Rights and Landmark Cases

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Political Science

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video explores the First Amendment's protection of free speech, highlighting historical and modern legal interpretations. It discusses key court cases like Brandenburg v. Ohio and Tinker v. Des Moines, which define the limits and protections of speech, including symbolic actions. The video also covers campaign spending as free speech and identifies types of speech not protected by the First Amendment, such as libel and obscenity.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the First Amendment primarily aim to protect?

Freedom of religion

Right to privacy

Freedom of speech

Right to bear arms

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which political party was targeted by the Alien and Sedition Acts?

Federalists

Whigs

Libertarians

Democratic-Republicans

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the political climate like during the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts?

Unified and harmonious

Bitter and partisan

Indifferent and apathetic

Peaceful and cooperative

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the Brandenburg v. Ohio case?

Speech can be restricted if it is offensive

Speech can be restricted if it incites imminent lawless action

All speech is protected under the First Amendment

Speech can be restricted if it criticizes the government

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which case established the test for restricting speech based on inciting lawless action?

Tinker v. Des Moines

Brandenburg v. Ohio

Citizens United v. FEC

Texas v. Johnson

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What type of speech was protected in Tinker v. Des Moines?

Political speech

Hate speech

Symbolic speech

Commercial speech

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the significance of the Texas v. Johnson case?

It protected symbolic speech like flag burning

It upheld the ban on flag burning

It allowed states to decide on flag burning laws

It restricted speech that is offensive

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?