Legal Cases and Political Parties in Slavery

Legal Cases and Political Parties in Slavery

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Moral Science

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video explores the road to secession, focusing on key court cases and political movements. It discusses the Commonwealth vs. Aves case, which set a precedent for freeing slaves in Massachusetts, and the formation of the Liberty Party, an early abolitionist political movement. The Prigg vs. Pennsylvania case is analyzed, highlighting tensions over the Fugitive Slave Act. Finally, the video examines the Southern strategy to control the Democratic Party to protect slavery.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the Commonwealth vs. Aves case in Massachusetts?

Slaves brought into Massachusetts were automatically free.

Slaves brought into Massachusetts were subject to a new trial.

Slaves brought into Massachusetts remained slaves.

Slaves brought into Massachusetts had to be returned to their owners.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the Massachusetts Supreme Court interpret Article 4, Section 2 of the Constitution in the Commonwealth vs. Aves case?

It applied to all slaves regardless of their status.

It was irrelevant to the case.

It did not apply because the slave was not an escapee.

It required all states to enforce slavery laws.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the primary goal of the Liberty Party when it was created in 1840?

To support the continuation of slavery.

To promote agrarian societal ideals.

To bring the abolitionist movement into politics.

To support the Democratic Party.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main reason for the creation of the Liberty Party?

To merge with the Whig Party.

To bring abolitionism into the political arena.

To promote the continuation of slavery.

To support the Democratic Party.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the initial reaction of Southerners to the Prigg vs. Pennsylvania case?

They were indifferent.

They believed it was a victory.

They saw it as a defeat.

They thought it was irrelevant.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did Pennsylvania respond to the Prigg vs. Pennsylvania ruling?

By ordering local authorities not to aid in capturing escaped slaves.

By passing a law to aid in the capture of escaped slaves.

By enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act more strictly.

By ignoring the ruling entirely.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did Southerners begin to lose faith in the Constitution by 1850?

The Constitution was seen as a reliable protection for slavery.

Northern violations of the Fugitive Slave Law were increasing.

The Constitution was amended to abolish slavery.

Northern states were strictly enforcing the Fugitive Slave Law.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?