Forensic Evidence and Wrongful Convictions

Forensic Evidence and Wrongful Convictions

Assessment

Interactive Video

Science

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Liam Anderson

FREE Resource

The video explores the wrongful conviction of Robert Lee Stinson, who was imprisoned based on flawed bite mark evidence. It highlights the evolution of forensic science, particularly the role of DNA evidence in exonerating the innocent. The video discusses the challenges and limitations of forensic methods, emphasizing the need for scientific rigor and reform. Stinson's case is resolved when DNA evidence identifies the true perpetrator, underscoring the importance of reliable forensic practices. The video concludes with a call for continued improvement in forensic science and an invitation for audience engagement through a Q&A session.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What significant event in 1985 is mentioned in the context of Robert Lee Stinson's case?

The release of the Hubble Space Telescope

The fall of the Berlin Wall

The publication of a paper on DNA in forensics

The release of the iPhone

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main reason for Robert Lee Stinson's wrongful conviction?

Fingerprint analysis

DNA evidence

Bite mark evidence

Eyewitness testimony

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the Innocence Project discover about the bite mark evidence used against Stinson?

It was tampered with

It was inconclusive

It was accurate

It was a series of errors

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is DNA evidence considered more reliable than fingerprints?

It is less expensive

It has a universal structure

It is easier to collect

It is more commonly found

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What makes DNA evidence powerful in distinguishing individuals?

Its ability to be easily altered

Its unique and quantifiable nature

Its similarity across individuals

Its reliance on eyewitness accounts

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the success rate of identifying the correct dental model in the bite mark study using pigs?

50%

10%

25%

2%

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the National Academy of Sciences report on forensic science?

It supported bite mark analysis

It found no scientific studies supporting bite mark identification

It recommended the abolition of forensic science

It praised the accuracy of forensic science

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?