The philosophical "burning building scenario"

The video presents a moral dilemma involving a burning building with a child in one room and a Picasso painting in another. It explores the effective altruism perspective, which suggests saving the Picasso to sell it and donate the proceeds to save more lives. However, the speaker criticizes this view, emphasizing the importance of emotional sympathy and labeling the choice to save the Picasso over the child as heartless.

What new insight or understanding did you gain from this video?