CLEAN : Rwanda trial of genocide suspect Jean-Bosc

The transcript discusses a legal case where a decision was not made due to an appeal at the Supreme Court level. The public prosecutor wanted the trial to continue, but the defense argued the court was not competent due to time constraints. The client faces charges as both an author and accomplice, but a previous decision by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda stated the client could not be prosecuted for complicity in genocide. The defense believes this decision should apply to the current case.

What new insight or understanding did you gain from this video?