routing protocols : Administrative Distance and multiple routes with the same mask

The video tutorial explains how OSPFv and RIP advertise the same network route, leading to a conflict resolved by administrative distance, which acts as a tiebreaker. It further discusses how routing decisions are made based on the longest match or best match criteria, with network 10.1.1.0/27 being chosen as the best route. Despite RIP having a higher administrative distance compared to OSPF, traffic is forwarded to router one due to the longest match rule.

What new insight or understanding did you gain from this video?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF