Should Apple Unlock the Terrorist's i-Phone?

The video discusses the conflict between Apple and the federal government over unlocking an iPhone belonging to Syed Farook, a San Bernardino shooter. The government wants Apple to create a backdoor to access the phone, citing the All Writs Act of 1789. Apple argues this sets a dangerous precedent for privacy and security. The video explores legal, technical, and ethical implications, as well as public and political reactions, including calls for boycotts. It concludes by questioning whether this is a legitimate use of the All Writs Act or a threat to privacy.

What new insight or understanding did you gain from this video?