Teacher's Evaluation of Master Books Curriculum

The teacher reviews a math curriculum, highlighting its simplicity and organization but criticizing its lack of depth and practice. While the curriculum is well-structured and easy to follow, it doesn't encourage critical thinking or application of math concepts. The teacher suggests using the curriculum with modifications, such as encouraging students to write in their own words instead of copying text. Ultimately, the teacher decides not to continue using it due to its limitations in fostering deeper understanding and practice.

What was the teacher's initial impression of the Master Books curriculum?

• It was too expensive.

• It was not well-structured.

• It was highly recommended.

• It was too advanced.

Why did the teacher decide to try a new curriculum despite liking Singapore Math?

• To find a cheaper option.

• To challenge stronger students.

• To follow a trend.

• To benefit weaker math students.

What did the teacher appreciate about the curriculum's structure?

• It had a clear layout with lessons and days.

• It was divided into multiple books.

• It was only available online.

• It was very colorful.

What was a major concern the teacher had about the curriculum?

• It was not available in print.

• It was too expensive.

• It lacked depth and critical thinking.

• It was too challenging.

What issue did the teacher have with the copywork approach?

• It was too short.

• It was too wordy and not effective.

• It was not included in the curriculum.

• It was too colorful.

What did the teacher suggest as a better alternative to copywork?

• Using flashcards.

• Writing in their own words.

• Memorizing definitions.

• Drawing diagrams.

Why did the teacher feel the curriculum lacked in terms of practice?

• It was too repetitive.

• It did not provide enough practice for mastery.

• It was too easy.

• It had too many exercises.

What was the teacher's final take on the Master Books curriculum?

• It was a decent curriculum but not for them.

• It was the best curriculum they had used.

• It was perfect for all students.

• It was too advanced for beginners.