Bayesian Analysis and P-Values

Bayesian Analysis and P-Values

Assessment

Interactive Video

Created by

Thomas White

Mathematics

11th Grade - University

Hard

Dr. Jay explains the differences between p-values and Bayesian posterior probabilities, using an example to illustrate how they can lead to different conclusions. The video discusses the Jeffrey Lindley Paradox, where frequentist and Bayesian methods disagree under certain conditions. It emphasizes understanding the distinct roles of p-values and Bayesian probabilities in hypothesis testing and model adequacy. The video concludes with a summary of the series and a preview of upcoming topics on comparing proportions and normal means.

Read more

11 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main topic of Dr. Jay's video?

The history of statistics

Advanced algebra techniques

Introduction to calculus

P-values and Bayesian posterior probabilities

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the hypothesis in the binomial model example?

The probability of success is 0.5

The probability of success is 0.7

The probability of success is 0.3

The probability of success is 0.9

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What p-value is obtained from the example with 10,000 observations?

0.05

0.047

0.1

0.02

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the posterior model probability in the Bayesian approach of the example?

0.96

0.5

0.8

0.1

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the Jeffrey Lindley Paradox?

A situation where Bayesian probabilities are always higher

A situation where all statistical models are incorrect

A situation where p-values and Bayesian probabilities disagree

A situation where p-values and Bayesian probabilities agree

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which condition is NOT part of the Jeffrey Lindley Paradox?

Small effect size

Equal prior model probabilities

Large number of observations

Precise alternative hypothesis

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the Jeffrey Lindley Paradox not considered a real problem?

Because it only occurs in small datasets

Because p-values and Bayesian probabilities measure different things

Because it is a rare occurrence

Because it only applies to normal distributions

Explore all questions with a free account

or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?