Genteelisms and Clear Communication

The video discusses the use of genteelisms and puff words in language, such as 'prior to' instead of 'before', and 'utilize' instead of 'use'. It argues that these words often complicate communication unnecessarily. The speaker encourages using simpler language for clarity and efficiency, and highlights the importance of being mindful of language choices to improve writing and communication.

What is the main issue with using genteelisms according to the speaker?

• They make communication less clear.

• They are too formal for everyday use.

• They are grammatically incorrect.

• They are not understood by everyone.

How does the speaker describe genteelisms?

• As a way to enhance vocabulary.

• As a tool for precise communication.

• As puff words that complicate language.

• As necessary for formal writing.

What is an example of a genteelism mentioned in the video?

• "Use" instead of "utilize"

• "Person" instead of "individual"

• "Now" instead of "at this time"

• "Before" instead of "prior to"

Why does the speaker suggest using 'before' instead of 'prior to'?

• It is more formal.

• It is shorter and clearer.

• It is more grammatically correct.

• It is a more modern term.

What does the speaker imply about the use of 'posterior to'?

• It is technically correct but not practical.

• It should be used more often.

• It is a common and accepted term.

• It is a preferred alternative to 'subsequent to'.

What is the downside of becoming aware of genteelisms, according to the speaker?

• You start using them more often.

• You become more critical of others' language.

• You find it harder to communicate.

• You become less attentive to your own writing.

How does the speaker suggest one can become an 'agent of light and goodness'?

• By correcting others' language mistakes.

• By avoiding the use of genteelisms.

• By writing more formally.

• By using genteelisms appropriately.